Politicians supported
33
distinct FEC recipients
pac · TX
$42K in PAC contributions is the entire footprint here: no lobbying, no contract awards on record. Data through August 2026.
The verdict
South Texas Sugar Cane Producers PAC Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, INC ranks in the top 79% of 21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity, entirely contribution-driven, anchored by Monica De la cruz -- a measured PAC history.
Where South Texas Sugar Cane Producers PAC Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, INC's total federal influence footprint sits
21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity
$42,416 17145th of 21666 higher than 4,521 of 21,666 organizations
the full population, bucketed by value
Each bar is a $50K-wide band; taller bars hold more organizations. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source FEC contributions, LDA lobbying disclosures, and USASpending federal contracts · August 2026
Politicians supported
33
distinct FEC recipients
Lobbying years filed
0
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
0
distinct policy categories
Each tracked channel is percentile-scored against its own national benchmark, then averaged across only the channels that apply to a pac -- not one dollar sum where contract size can drown out everything else.
Overall activity score
F
10/100
Campaign contributions
F
22/100 · $42K
Lobbying expenditures
F
7/100 · $0
Federal contracts
F
2/100 · $0
Independent expenditures
F
10/100 · $0
South Texas Sugar Cane Producers PAC Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, INC, with a disclosed filing address in TX, has no lobbying disclosures and no federal contracts on record. Its footprint here is entirely campaign giving: a measured PAC contribution history of $42K reported to the Federal Election Commission, its largest recipient Monica De la cruz.
On the campaign side, South Texas Sugar Cane Producers PAC Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, INC's PAC contributions reached 33 federal politicians, led by Monica De la cruz at $2K.
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Monica De la cruz | R | $2K |
| Vicente Gonzalez | D | $2K |
| Jasmine Crockett | D | $2K |
| John R Rep. Carter | R | $2K |
| Joaquin Castro | D | $2K |
| Keith Alan Mr Self | R | $2K |
| Nathaniel Quentin Moran | R | $2K |
| Ernest Anthony Tony Ii Gonzales | R | $2K |
| Elizabeth Ann Van duyne | R | $2K |
| John Kevin Sr. Ellzey | R | $2K |
| Lance Gooden | R | $2K |
| Veronica Escobar | D | $2K |
| Greg Casar | D | $1K |
| Henry R. Cuellar | D | $1K |
| Colin Allred | D | $1K |
| Daniel Crenshaw | R | $1K |
| August Lee Ii Pfluger | R | $1K |
| Jodey Arrington | R | $1K |
| Morgan Joe Luttrell | R | $1K |
| Michael Cloud | R | $1K |
| Michael Mccaul | R | $1K |
| Troy Nehls | R | $1K |
| Pete Sessions | R | $1K |
| Sheila Jackson Lee | D | $1K |
| Brian Babin | R | $1K |
| Elizabeth Fletcher | D | $1K |
| Sylvia R Garcia | D | $1K |
| Rafael Edward Ted Cruz | R | $1K |
| Ronny Lynn Jackson | R | $1K |
| Randy Weber | R | $1K |
| Wesley Hunt | R | $500 |
| Brandon Gill | R | $458 |
| Craig Goldman | R | $458 |
South Texas Sugar Cane Producers PAC Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, INC has a combined recorded federal activity total of $42K, made up of $42K in campaign contributions. This is a convenience sum across three separate official populations, not a measure of causal political influence. Data from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov for 2023-2024.
South Texas Sugar Cane Producers PAC Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, INC contributed $42K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. South Texas Sugar Cane Producers PAC Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, INC supported 33 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Monica De la cruz ($2K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
Combined activity (internally total_influence) is a convenience sum of three different official populations: FEC campaign contributions (2024 election cycle), Senate LDA lobbying expenditures (2023 and 2024 filing years, summed), and USAspending federal contract obligations (fiscal year 2024). It is a cross-dataset discovery index only, not causation, effectiveness, or political influence. Channel dollars are shown side by side; see /methodology#cross-stage-populations.
What to do with this organization
Every figure traces to a real FEC, LDA, or USASpending filing; contribution and lobbying totals are not the same as spending on any specific outcome.
According to the Federal Election Commission and the Senate Office of Public Records, more than 14,000 political action committees and over 12,500 lobbying registrants filed disclosure reports covering the 2024 election cycle and calendar-year 2024 lobbying period respectively. Every figure on this page comes from official FEC, Senate LDA, or USAspending.gov filings, described on our methodology page. Data was last updated in August 2026.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.