Politicians supported
9
distinct FEC recipients
pac · DC
COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD
Combined federal influence footprint of $47K, led by lobbying expenditures ($40K) — sourced from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov filings for 2023–2024.
- $47K
- Total influence
- $7K
- Contributions
- $40K
- Lobbying
Lobbying years filed
1
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
3
distinct policy categories
How COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD's federal influence breaks down
The three tracked channels for COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD, side by side. Its largest channel is lobbying expenditures at $40K.
Lobbying share of total influence 85.2%
Higher share = lobbying-heavy strategy vs. contributions or contracts
What COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD's influence footprint shows
COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD, headquartered in DC, registers a combined federal influence footprint of $47K across the three primary channels tracked in public filings: $7K in PAC campaign contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission, $40K in lobbying expenditures disclosed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act, and $0 in federal contract awards recorded on USAspending.gov. Together these figures reflect both how the organization seeks to influence policy and how federal dollars flow back to it.
On the campaign side, COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD's PAC contributions reached 9 federal politicians, led by Ashley Ehasz at $2K. Its lobbying profile spans 1 reporting year across 3 distinct LDA issue areas, with emphasis on Budget/Appropriations, Foreign Relations, Defense.
Viewing contributions, lobbying, and contracts side-by-side is the key to reading this organization's relationship with the federal government: campaign giving signals which lawmakers are prioritized, lobbying expenditures signal which policy outcomes are being pursued, and contract awards signal where procurement decisions have already landed. Each component is independently sourced from official government disclosures covering the 2023-2024 period.
Politicians supported
Top recipients of COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD PAC contributions · FEC (2024 cycle)
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Ashley Ehasz | D | $2K |
| Susan Wild | D | $2K |
| Angela Alsobrooks | D | $1K |
| Kristen Mcdonald rivet | D | $1K |
| Debbie Mucarsel-powell | D | $1K |
| Kirsten Engel | D | $500 |
| Angela Dawn Craig | D | $150 |
| Josh Harder | D | $150 |
| Eric Sorensen | D | $150 |
Lobbying by year
| Year | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2023 | $40K |
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD have?
COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD has a combined political influence footprint of $47K, which includes $7K in campaign contributions, $40K in lobbying expenditures, and $0 in federal contracts. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD support?
COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD contributed $7K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD supported 9 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Ashley Ehasz ($2K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
What issues does COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD lobby on?
COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD spent $40K on federal lobbying. Key issue areas include Budget/Appropriations, Foreign Relations, Defense. Lobbying disclosures are filed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) and are public record.
Where does the data about COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Learn more
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.