Candidates targeted
10
races with outside spending
pac · DC
PRO-CHOICE WOMEN
An outside-spending committee: $3.2M in independent expenditures ($280K supporting, $2.9M opposing candidates) - reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign.
- $3.2M
- Independent expenditures
- $280K
- Supporting
- $2.9M
- Opposing
- $875K
- Contributions
The verdict
PRO-CHOICE WOMEN is an outside-spending committee: it made $3.2M in independent expenditures across 10 candidates, mostly opposing ($2.9M).
- $280K
- spent supporting candidates
- $2.9M
- spent opposing candidates
- $875K
- direct contributions
Supporting
$280K
independent expenditures for
Opposing
$2.9M
independent expenditures against
Independent expenditures by PRO-CHOICE WOMEN
Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.
- $3.2M
- Total outside spending
- $280K
- Supporting
- $2.9M
- Opposing
| Candidate | Supporting | Opposing |
|---|---|---|
| Derek Merrin | - | $591K |
| Joseph Kent | - | $450K |
| Timothy Gabriel Joseph Evans | - | $450K |
| Kevin Coughlin | - | $350K |
| Derrick F. Mr. Van orden | - | $325K |
| Mariannette Jane Miller-meeks | - | $325K |
| Paul Junge | - | $312K |
| Sabina Matos | $150K | - |
| Joanna Weiss | $130K | - |
| George S Logan | - | $100K |
What PRO-CHOICE WOMEN's influence footprint shows
PRO-CHOICE WOMEN is an outside-spending committee: rather than contributing to candidates' committees, it reported $3.2M in independent expenditures to the Federal Election Commission - $280K advocating for candidates and $2.9M opposing them, across 10 races. By law these expenditures are made independently of, and uncoordinated with, any campaign, and they are not subject to contribution limits, which is how a single committee can deploy this scale of money. They are reported here separately from contributions because they are a fundamentally different mechanism of political influence.
On the campaign side, PRO-CHOICE WOMEN's PAC contributions reached 133 federal politicians, led by Marcy Hon. M.c. Kaptur at $16K.
Politicians supported
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does PRO-CHOICE WOMEN have?
PRO-CHOICE WOMEN has a combined political influence footprint of $875K, made up of $875K in campaign contributions. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does PRO-CHOICE WOMEN support?
PRO-CHOICE WOMEN contributed $875K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. PRO-CHOICE WOMEN supported 133 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Marcy Hon. M.c. Kaptur ($16K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
Where does the data about PRO-CHOICE WOMEN come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Related guides
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.