Candidates targeted
10
races with outside spending
pac · DC
Pro-Choice Women
An outside-spending committee: $3.2M in independent expenditures ($280K supporting, $2.9M opposing candidates) - reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign. Data through August 2026.
- $3.2M
- Independent expenditures
- $280K
- Supporting
- $2.9M
- Opposing
- $875K
- Contributions
The verdict
Pro-Choice Women is an outside-spending committee: it made $3.2M in independent expenditures across 10 candidates, mostly opposing ($2.9M).
- $280K
- spent supporting candidates
- $2.9M
- spent opposing candidates
- $875K
- direct contributions
Where Pro-Choice Women's total federal influence footprint sits
21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity
$874,810 4091st of 21666 higher than 17,575 of 21,666 organizations
the full population, bucketed by value
Each bar is a $50K-wide band; taller bars hold more organizations. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source FEC contributions, LDA lobbying disclosures, and USASpending federal contracts · August 2026
Supporting
$280K
independent expenditures for
Opposing
$2.9M
independent expenditures against
Independent expenditures by Pro-Choice Women
Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.
- $3.2M
- Total outside spending
- $280K
- Supporting
- $2.9M
- Opposing
| Candidate | Supporting | Opposing |
|---|---|---|
| Derek Merrin | - | $591K |
| Joseph Kent | - | $450K |
| Timothy Gabriel Joseph Evans | - | $450K |
| Kevin Coughlin | - | $350K |
| Derrick F. Mr. Van orden | - | $325K |
| Mariannette Jane Miller-meeks | - | $325K |
| Paul Junge | - | $312K |
| Sabina Matos | $150K | - |
| Joanna Weiss | $130K | - |
| George S Logan | - | $100K |
Pro-Choice Women's influence activity score
Each tracked channel is percentile-scored against its own national benchmark, then averaged across only the channels that apply to a pac -- not one dollar sum where contract size can drown out everything else.
Overall activity score
F
46/100
Campaign contributions
A
100/100 · $875K
Lobbying expenditures
F
7/100 · $0
Federal contracts
F
2/100 · $0
Independent expenditures
C
73/100 · $3.2M
What Pro-Choice Women's recorded federal activity shows
Pro-Choice Women is an outside-spending committee: rather than contributing to candidates' committees, it reported $3.2M in independent expenditures to the Federal Election Commission - $280K advocating for candidates and $2.9M opposing them, across 10 races. By law these expenditures are made independently of, and uncoordinated with, any campaign, and they are not subject to contribution limits, which is how a single committee can deploy this scale of money. They are reported here separately from contributions because they are a fundamentally different mechanism of political influence.
On the campaign side, Pro-Choice Women's PAC contributions reached 133 federal politicians, led by Marcy Hon. M.c. Kaptur at $16K.
Politicians supported
Nationwide peers with similar federal activity
Cross-state nearest neighbors on two independent axes, combined tracked activity and Senate LDA lobbying spend, so the lattice is not filing-state containment.
Similar combined federal activity
Other organizations with nearest total contributions + lobbying + contracts ($875K here), outside DC filing-state peers.
Frequently asked questions
How much recorded federal activity does Pro-Choice Women have?
Pro-Choice Women has a combined recorded federal activity total of $875K, made up of $875K in campaign contributions. This is a convenience sum across three separate official populations, not a measure of causal political influence. Data from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does Pro-Choice Women support?
Pro-Choice Women contributed $875K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. Pro-Choice Women supported 133 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Marcy Hon. M.c. Kaptur ($16K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
Where does the data about Pro-Choice Women come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "combined activity" and how is it calculated?
Combined activity (internally total_influence) is a convenience sum of three different official populations: FEC campaign contributions (2024 election cycle), Senate LDA lobbying expenditures (2023 and 2024 filing years, summed), and USAspending federal contract obligations (fiscal year 2024). It is a cross-dataset discovery index only, not causation, effectiveness, or political influence. Channel dollars are shown side by side; see /methodology#cross-stage-populations.
Related guides
What to do with this organization
- Compare Pro-Choice Women's footprint against similar organizations nationwide. Activity rankings
- Search for a specific politician this organization has supported. Browse politicians
- See how this organization's home state compares in aggregate influence activity. State profiles
Every figure traces to a real FEC, LDA, or USASpending filing; contribution and lobbying totals are not the same as spending on any specific outcome.
According to the Federal Election Commission and the Senate Office of Public Records, more than 14,000 political action committees and over 12,500 lobbying registrants filed disclosure reports covering the 2024 election cycle and calendar-year 2024 lobbying period respectively. Every figure on this page comes from official FEC, Senate LDA, or USAspending.gov filings, described on our methodology page. Data was last updated in August 2026.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.