pac · DC

GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS

A measured campaign-giving-only footprint: $50K in PAC contributions, no lobbying or contract activity on record.

$50K
Total influence
$50K
Contributions

The verdict

GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS ranks in the top 77% of 21,545 organizations with tracked federal activity, driven entirely by a measured PAC contribution history, topped by giving to Chris Pappas.

Top 77%
of 21,545 tracked organizations
$50K
campaign contributions

Politicians supported

31

distinct FEC recipients

Lobbying years filed

0

LDA disclosure years

LDA issue areas

0

distinct policy categories

What GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS's influence footprint shows

GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS, headquartered in DC, shows no lobbying or contract activity in this dataset -- the entire tracked footprint is campaign giving: $50K in PAC contributions reported to the FEC, led by giving to Chris Pappas.

On the campaign side, GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS's PAC contributions reached 31 federal politicians, led by Chris Pappas at $6K.

Politicians supported

Chris Pappas$6KKirsten Engel$5KAmish Dr. Shah$5KMike Levin$3KRuben Gallego$3KSharice Davids$2KJanelle Bynum$2KAdam Schiff$1K
Top recipients of GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS PAC contributions · FEC (2024 cycle)
Politician Party Amount
Chris Pappas D $6K
Kirsten Engel D $5K
Amish Dr. Shah D $5K
Mike Levin D $3K
Ruben Gallego D $3K
Sharice Davids D $2K
Janelle Bynum D $2K
Adam Schiff D $1K
Kim Dr. Schrier D $1K
Emilia Sykes D $1K
Mary Peltola D $1K
Nikki Budzinski D $1K
Eric Sorensen D $1K
Thomas Suozzi D $1K
Susan Wild D $1K
Susie Lee D $1K
Patrick Ryan D $1K
Hillary Scholten D $1K
Dina Titus D $1K
Andrea Salinas D $1K
Yadira Caraveo D $1K
Matthew A. Cartwright D $1K
Christopher Deluzio D $1K
Gabriel Vasquez D $1K
Mondaire Jones D $1K
Jonathan Michael Nez D $1K
Angela Dawn Craig D $1K
Don Davis D $1K
Jahana Hayes D $1K
Greg Landsman D $1K
Marie Gluesenkamp perez D $1K

Frequently asked questions

How much political influence does GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS have?

GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS has a combined political influence footprint of $50K, made up of $50K in campaign contributions. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.

Which politicians does GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS support?

GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS contributed $50K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS supported 31 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Chris Pappas ($6K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.

Where does the data about GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS come from?

PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.

What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?

Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.

Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.