Politicians supported
22
distinct FEC recipients
pac · DC
AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION
Active on two fronts: $113K in campaign contributions and $890K in lobbying, no federal contracts on record.
- $1.0M
- Total influence
- $113K
- Contributions
- $890K
- Lobbying
The verdict
AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION ranks in the top 17% of 21,545 organizations with tracked federal activity, split between campaign contributions and lobbying, with no federal contracts on record.
- Top 17%
- of 21,545 tracked organizations
- $113K
- campaign contributions
- $890K
- lobbying expenditures
Lobbying years filed
2
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
2
distinct policy categories
How AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION's federal influence breaks down
The three tracked channels for AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION, side by side. Its largest channel is lobbying expenditures at $890K.
Lobbying share of total influence 88.8%
Higher share = lobbying-heavy strategy vs. contributions or contracts
What AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION's influence footprint shows
AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION, headquartered in DC, pairs campaign giving with lobbying but holds no federal contracts: $113K in PAC contributions alongside $890K in disclosed lobbying expenditures.
On the campaign side, AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION's PAC contributions reached 22 federal politicians, led by Scott Peters at $10K. Its lobbying profile spans 2 reporting years across 2 distinct LDA issue areas, with emphasis on Medicare/Medicaid, Health Issues.
Politicians supported
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Peters | D | $10K |
| Richard L. Jr. Hudson | R | $10K |
| William J. Jr. Pascrell | D | $10K |
| Gus M Bilirakis | R | $10K |
| Sherrod Brown | D | $9K |
| S. Brett Hon. Guthrie | R | $8K |
| Jason T Smith | R | $8K |
| Richard E Neal | D | $8K |
| Anna G Eshoo | D | $5K |
| Frank Jr Pallone | D | $5K |
| John Joyce | R | $5K |
| Brian Fitzpatrick | R | $5K |
| Lori Trahan | D | $4K |
| Cathy Mcmorris rodgers | R | $3K |
| Larry D. Bucshon | R | $3K |
| Michael C. Dr. Burgess | R | $3K |
| Nanette Barragan | D | $3K |
| Diana L Degette | D | $3K |
| Marsha Mrs. Blackburn | R | $2K |
| Neal Patrick Md Facs Dunn | R | $2K |
| Terri A. Sewell | D | $1K |
| Daniel Crenshaw | R | $1K |
Lobbying by year
| Year | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $600K |
| 2023 | $290K |
Lobbying issues
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION have?
AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION has a combined political influence footprint of $1.0M, made up of $113K in campaign contributions and $890K in lobbying expenditures. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION support?
AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION contributed $113K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION supported 22 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Scott Peters ($10K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
What issues does AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION lobby on?
AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION spent $890K on federal lobbying. Key issue areas include Medicare/Medicaid, Health Issues. Lobbying disclosures are filed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) and are public record.
Where does the data about AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Related guides
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.