Politicians supported
14
distinct FEC recipients
pac · OH
AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC'
$55K in PAC contributions is the entire footprint here: no lobbying, no contract awards on record.
- $55K
- Total influence
- $55K
- Contributions
The verdict
AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC' ranks in the top 75% of 21,545 organizations with tracked federal activity, entirely contribution-driven, anchored by Neal Patrick Md Facs Dunn -- a measured PAC history.
- Top 75%
- of 21,545 tracked organizations
- $55K
- campaign contributions
Lobbying years filed
0
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
0
distinct policy categories
What AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC''s influence footprint shows
AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC', headquartered in OH, has no lobbying disclosures and no federal contracts on record. Its footprint here is entirely campaign giving: a measured PAC contribution history of $55K reported to the Federal Election Commission, its largest recipient Neal Patrick Md Facs Dunn.
On the campaign side, AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC''s PAC contributions reached 14 federal politicians, led by Neal Patrick Md Facs Dunn at $5K.
Politicians supported
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Neal Patrick Md Facs Dunn | R | $5K |
| Gregory Francis Dr. Murphy | R | $5K |
| Richard E Neal | D | $5K |
| Vernon Buchanan | R | $5K |
| Robert For Jr. Onder | R | $5K |
| Frank Jr Pallone | D | $5K |
| Amerish Bera | D | $5K |
| Lloyd Doggett | D | $5K |
| Kim Dr. Schrier | D | $5K |
| Raul Dr. Ruiz | D | $5K |
| Bernard Sanders | I | $5K |
| Richard Dean Dr. Mccormick | R | $5K |
| S. Brett Hon. Guthrie | R | $5K |
| Debbie Stabenow | D | $-10,000 |
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC' have?
AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC' has a combined political influence footprint of $55K, made up of $55K in campaign contributions. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC' support?
AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC' contributed $55K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC' supported 14 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Neal Patrick Md Facs Dunn ($5K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
Where does the data about AKSM UROLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 'AKSM UROLOGY PAC' come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Related guides
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.