Politicians supported
18
distinct FEC recipients
pac · WI
GOLDFINCH PAC
$130K in PAC contributions is the entire footprint here: no lobbying, no contract awards on record.
- $130K
- Total influence
- $130K
- Contributions
- $18K
- Outside spending
The verdict
GOLDFINCH PAC ranks in the top 56% of 21,545 organizations with tracked federal activity, entirely contribution-driven, anchored by John A Barrasso -- a sizable PAC history.
- Top 56%
- of 21,545 tracked organizations
- $130K
- campaign contributions
- $18K
- outside spending (independent)
Lobbying years filed
0
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
0
distinct policy categories
Independent expenditures by GOLDFINCH PAC
Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.
- $18K
- Total outside spending
- $18K
- Supporting
- $0
- Opposing
| Candidate | Supporting | Opposing |
|---|---|---|
| Debra S. Fischer | $18K | - |
What GOLDFINCH PAC's influence footprint shows
GOLDFINCH PAC, headquartered in WI, has no lobbying disclosures and no federal contracts on record. Its footprint here is entirely campaign giving: a sizable PAC contribution history of $130K reported to the Federal Election Commission, its largest recipient John A Barrasso.
On the campaign side, GOLDFINCH PAC's PAC contributions reached 18 federal politicians, led by John A Barrasso at $10K.
Politicians supported
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| John A Barrasso | R | $10K |
| Roger Sen. Wicker | R | $10K |
| Rick Sen Scott | R | $10K |
| Michael J Rogers | R | $10K |
| Joshua David Sen Hawley | R | $10K |
| Eric Hovde | R | $10K |
| Rafael Edward Ted Cruz | R | $8K |
| Debra S. Fischer | R | $8K |
| Tim Sheehy | R | $8K |
| Pete Ricketts | R | $8K |
| Larry Hogan | R | $8K |
| Kari Lake | R | $8K |
| Randall Feenstra | R | $5K |
| Kevin Mr. Cramer | R | $5K |
| Nella Louise Louise Domenici | R | $5K |
| Bernie Moreno | R | $5K |
| James E. Hon. Banks | R | $3K |
| James Conley Ii Justice | R | $3K |
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does GOLDFINCH PAC have?
GOLDFINCH PAC has a combined political influence footprint of $130K, made up of $130K in campaign contributions. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does GOLDFINCH PAC support?
GOLDFINCH PAC contributed $130K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. GOLDFINCH PAC supported 18 politicians, with the largest contribution going to John A Barrasso ($10K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
Where does the data about GOLDFINCH PAC come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Related guides
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.