pac · CO

Protect Our Kids

An outside-spending committee: $5K in independent expenditures ($0 supporting, $5K opposing candidates) - reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign. Data through August 2026.

$5K
Independent expenditures
$5K
Opposing
$3K
Contributions

The verdict

Protect Our Kids is an outside-spending committee: it made $5K in independent expenditures across 1 candidate, mostly opposing ($5K).

$5K
spent opposing candidates
$3K
direct contributions

Where Protect Our Kids's total federal influence footprint sits

21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity

$3,250 21071st of 21666 higher than 595 of 21,666 organizations

the full population, bucketed by value

Each bar is a $50K-wide band; taller bars hold more organizations. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FEC contributions, LDA lobbying disclosures, and USASpending federal contracts · August 2026

Candidates targeted

1

races with outside spending

Supporting

$0

independent expenditures for

Opposing

$5K

independent expenditures against

Independent expenditures by Protect Our Kids

Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.

$5K
Total outside spending
$0
Supporting
$5K
Opposing
Candidate Supporting Opposing
Rick Becker - $5K

Protect Our Kids's influence activity score

Each tracked channel is percentile-scored against its own national benchmark, then averaged across only the channels that apply to a pac -- not one dollar sum where contract size can drown out everything else.

Overall activity score

F

7/100

Campaign contributions

F

10/100 · $3K

Lobbying expenditures

F

7/100 · $0

Federal contracts

F

2/100 · $0

Independent expenditures

F

10/100 · $5K

What Protect Our Kids's recorded federal activity shows

Protect Our Kids is an outside-spending committee: rather than contributing to candidates' committees, it reported $5K in independent expenditures to the Federal Election Commission - $0 advocating for candidates and $5K opposing them, across 1 race. By law these expenditures are made independently of, and uncoordinated with, any campaign, and they are not subject to contribution limits, which is how a single committee can deploy this scale of money. They are reported here separately from contributions because they are a fundamentally different mechanism of political influence.

On the campaign side, Protect Our Kids's PAC contributions reached 7 federal politicians, led by Angela Alsobrooks at $1K.

Politicians supported

Angela Alsobrooks$1KJeffrey Hurd$500Rudy Salas$500Mary Miller$500Alex Balazs$250Robert P. Jr. Casey$250Mike Kennedy$250
Top recipients of Protect Our Kids PAC contributions · FEC (2024 cycle)
Politician Party Amount
Angela Alsobrooks D $1K
Jeffrey Hurd R $500
Rudy Salas D $500
Mary Miller R $500
Alex Balazs R $250
Robert P. Jr. Casey D $250
Mike Kennedy R $250

Frequently asked questions

How much recorded federal activity does Protect Our Kids have?

Protect Our Kids has a combined recorded federal activity total of $3K, made up of $3K in campaign contributions. This is a convenience sum across three separate official populations, not a measure of causal political influence. Data from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov for 2023-2024.

Which politicians does Protect Our Kids support?

Protect Our Kids contributed $3K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. Protect Our Kids supported 7 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Angela Alsobrooks ($1K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.

Where does the data about Protect Our Kids come from?

PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.

What is "combined activity" and how is it calculated?

Combined activity (internally total_influence) is a convenience sum of three different official populations: FEC campaign contributions (2024 election cycle), Senate LDA lobbying expenditures (2023 and 2024 filing years, summed), and USAspending federal contract obligations (fiscal year 2024). It is a cross-dataset discovery index only, not causation, effectiveness, or political influence. Channel dollars are shown side by side; see /methodology#cross-stage-populations.

What to do with this organization

Every figure traces to a real FEC, LDA, or USASpending filing; contribution and lobbying totals are not the same as spending on any specific outcome.

According to the Federal Election Commission and the Senate Office of Public Records, more than 14,000 political action committees and over 12,500 lobbying registrants filed disclosure reports covering the 2024 election cycle and calendar-year 2024 lobbying period respectively. Every figure on this page comes from official FEC, Senate LDA, or USAspending.gov filings, described on our methodology page. Data was last updated in August 2026.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence.

Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.