Politicians supported
12
distinct FEC recipients
pac · CA
ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION
Combined federal influence footprint of $455K, led by campaign contributions ($419K) — sourced from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov filings for 2023–2024.
- $455K
- Total influence
- $419K
- Contributions
- $36K
- Lobbying
Lobbying years filed
1
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
1
distinct policy categories
How ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION's federal influence breaks down
The three tracked channels for ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, side by side. Its largest channel is campaign contributions at $419K.
Lobbying share of total influence 7.9%
Higher share = lobbying-heavy strategy vs. contributions or contracts
What ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION's influence footprint shows
ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, headquartered in CA, registers a combined federal influence footprint of $455K across the three primary channels tracked in public filings: $419K in PAC campaign contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission, $36K in lobbying expenditures disclosed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act, and $0 in federal contract awards recorded on USAspending.gov. Together these figures reflect both how the organization seeks to influence policy and how federal dollars flow back to it.
On the campaign side, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION's PAC contributions reached 12 federal politicians, led by Amish Dr. Shah at $70K. Its lobbying profile spans 1 reporting year across 1 distinct LDA issue area, with emphasis on Animals.
Viewing contributions, lobbying, and contracts side-by-side is the key to reading this organization's relationship with the federal government: campaign giving signals which lawmakers are prioritized, lobbying expenditures signal which policy outcomes are being pursued, and contract awards signal where procurement decisions have already landed. Each component is independently sourced from official government disclosures covering the 2023-2024 period.
Politicians supported
Top recipients of ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION PAC contributions · FEC (2024 cycle)
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Amish Dr. Shah | D | $70K |
| John Duarte | R | $61K |
| Brandon Mcdonald Williams | R | $61K |
| Don Davis | D | $50K |
| Michelle Steel | R | $48K |
| Brian Fitzpatrick | R | $44K |
| Nancy Mace | R | $31K |
| Michael Garcia | R | $24K |
| David Valadao | R | $16K |
| Hilary Franz | D | $10K |
| Anna Paulina luna | R | $3K |
| Donald J Bacon | R | $2K |
Lobbying by year
| Year | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $36K |
Lobbying issues
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION have?
ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION has a combined political influence footprint of $455K, which includes $419K in campaign contributions, $36K in lobbying expenditures, and $0 in federal contracts. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION support?
ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION contributed $419K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION supported 12 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Amish Dr. Shah ($70K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
What issues does ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION lobby on?
ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION spent $36K on federal lobbying. Key issue areas include Animals. Lobbying disclosures are filed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) and are public record.
Where does the data about ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Learn more
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.