Candidates targeted
6
races with outside spending
party · DC
COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016
An outside-spending committee: $42.7M in independent expenditures ($0 supporting, $42.7M opposing candidates) - reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign.
- $42.7M
- Independent expenditures
- $42.7M
- Opposing
- $231K
- Contributions
The verdict
COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 is an outside-spending committee: it made $42.7M in independent expenditures across 6 candidates, mostly opposing ($42.7M).
- $42.7M
- spent opposing candidates
- $231K
- direct contributions
Supporting
$0
independent expenditures for
Opposing
$42.7M
independent expenditures against
Independent expenditures by COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016
Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.
- $42.7M
- Total outside spending
- $0
- Supporting
- $42.7M
- Opposing
| Candidate | Supporting | Opposing |
|---|---|---|
| Michael J Rogers | - | $12.3M |
| Dave Mccormick | - | $10.5M |
| Eric D Hovde | - | $6.5M |
| Kari Lake | - | $5.1M |
| Tim Sheehy | - | $4.5M |
| Eric Hovde | - | $3.7M |
What COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016's influence footprint shows
COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 is an outside-spending committee: rather than contributing to candidates' committees, it reported $42.7M in independent expenditures to the Federal Election Commission - $0 advocating for candidates and $42.7M opposing them, across 6 races. By law these expenditures are made independently of, and uncoordinated with, any campaign, and they are not subject to contribution limits, which is how a single committee can deploy this scale of money. They are reported here separately from contributions because they are a fundamentally different mechanism of political influence.
On the campaign side, COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016's PAC contributions reached 4 federal politicians, led by Debbie Mucarsel-powell at $58K.
Politicians supported
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Debbie Mucarsel-powell | D | $58K |
| Angela Alsobrooks | D | $58K |
| Colin Allred | D | $58K |
| Dan Osborn | I | $58K |
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 have?
COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 has a combined political influence footprint of $231K, made up of $231K in campaign contributions. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 support?
COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 contributed $231K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 supported 4 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Debbie Mucarsel-powell ($58K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
Where does the data about COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Related guides
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.