pac · VA

Progressive Victory

An outside-spending committee: $59K in independent expenditures ($59K supporting, $0 opposing candidates) - reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign. Data through August 2026.

$59K
Independent expenditures
$59K
Supporting
$51K
Contributions

The verdict

Progressive Victory is an outside-spending committee: it made $59K in independent expenditures across 2 candidates, mostly supporting ($59K).

$59K
spent supporting candidates
$51K
direct contributions

Where Progressive Victory's total federal influence footprint sits

21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity

$50,503 16547th of 21666 higher than 5,119 of 21,666 organizations

the full population, bucketed by value

Each bar is a $50K-wide band; taller bars hold more organizations. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source FEC contributions, LDA lobbying disclosures, and USASpending federal contracts · August 2026

Candidates targeted

2

races with outside spending

Supporting

$59K

independent expenditures for

Opposing

$0

independent expenditures against

Independent expenditures by Progressive Victory

Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.

$59K
Total outside spending
$59K
Supporting
$0
Opposing
Candidate Supporting Opposing
Jamaal Bowman $55K -
Kamala Harris $4K -

Progressive Victory's influence activity score

Each tracked channel is percentile-scored against its own national benchmark, then averaged across only the channels that apply to a pac -- not one dollar sum where contract size can drown out everything else.

Overall activity score

F

11/100

Campaign contributions

F

25/100 · $51K

Lobbying expenditures

F

7/100 · $0

Federal contracts

F

2/100 · $0

Independent expenditures

F

11/100 · $59K

What Progressive Victory's recorded federal activity shows

Progressive Victory is an outside-spending committee: rather than contributing to candidates' committees, it reported $59K in independent expenditures to the Federal Election Commission - $59K advocating for candidates and $0 opposing them, across 2 races. By law these expenditures are made independently of, and uncoordinated with, any campaign, and they are not subject to contribution limits, which is how a single committee can deploy this scale of money. They are reported here separately from contributions because they are a fundamentally different mechanism of political influence.

On the campaign side, Progressive Victory's PAC contributions reached 2 federal politicians, led by Kamala Harris at $49K.

Politicians supported

Politician Party Amount
Kamala Harris D $49K
Tammy Baldwin D $2K

Frequently asked questions

How much recorded federal activity does Progressive Victory have?

Progressive Victory has a combined recorded federal activity total of $51K, made up of $51K in campaign contributions. This is a convenience sum across three separate official populations, not a measure of causal political influence. Data from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov for 2023-2024.

Which politicians does Progressive Victory support?

Progressive Victory contributed $51K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. Progressive Victory supported 2 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Kamala Harris ($49K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.

Where does the data about Progressive Victory come from?

PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.

What is "combined activity" and how is it calculated?

Combined activity (internally total_influence) is a convenience sum of three different official populations: FEC campaign contributions (2024 election cycle), Senate LDA lobbying expenditures (2023 and 2024 filing years, summed), and USAspending federal contract obligations (fiscal year 2024). It is a cross-dataset discovery index only, not causation, effectiveness, or political influence. Channel dollars are shown side by side; see /methodology#cross-stage-populations.

Related guides

Follow the Money
Tracing the flow of political contributions
Lobbying Explained
How lobbying works and why it matters
Top Gov Contractors
The biggest federal contractors by spending
Activity rankings
See how organizations rank by combined activity

What to do with this organization

Every figure traces to a real FEC, LDA, or USASpending filing; contribution and lobbying totals are not the same as spending on any specific outcome.

According to the Federal Election Commission and the Senate Office of Public Records, more than 14,000 political action committees and over 12,500 lobbying registrants filed disclosure reports covering the 2024 election cycle and calendar-year 2024 lobbying period respectively. Every figure on this page comes from official FEC, Senate LDA, or USAspending.gov filings, described on our methodology page. Data was last updated in August 2026.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence.

Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.