pac · CA

PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES

An outside-spending committee: $2.1M in independent expenditures ($867K supporting, $1.2M opposing candidates) - reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign.

$2.1M
Independent expenditures
$867K
Supporting
$1.2M
Opposing

The verdict

PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES is an outside-spending committee: it made $2.1M in independent expenditures across 20 candidates, mostly opposing ($1.2M).

$867K
spent supporting candidates
$1.2M
spent opposing candidates

Candidates targeted

20

races with outside spending

Supporting

$867K

independent expenditures for

Opposing

$1.2M

independent expenditures against

Independent expenditures by PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES

Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.

$2.1M
Total outside spending
$867K
Supporting
$1.2M
Opposing
Candidate Supporting Opposing
Scott Baugh - $392K
Michelle Steel - $328K
Dave Min $320K -
John Duarte - $281K
Derek Tran $205K -
Adam C. Gray $180K -
Michael Garcia - $101K
George Whitesides $95K -
Donald J. Trump - $72K
Kamala Harris $44K -
Ken Calvert - $23K
David Valadao - $12K
Will Rollins $10K -
James Michael Johnson - $7K
Adam Schiff $6K -
Rudy Salas $5K -
Kevin Kiley - $5K
Jessica Morse $1K -
Young Kim - $1K
Joseph Kerr $917 -

What PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES's influence footprint shows

PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES is an outside-spending committee: rather than contributing to candidates' committees, it reported $2.1M in independent expenditures to the Federal Election Commission - $867K advocating for candidates and $1.2M opposing them, across 20 races. By law these expenditures are made independently of, and uncoordinated with, any campaign, and they are not subject to contribution limits, which is how a single committee can deploy this scale of money. They are reported here separately from contributions because they are a fundamentally different mechanism of political influence.

Frequently asked questions

How much political influence does PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES have?

PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES has no campaign contributions, lobbying expenditures, or federal contracts on record in this dataset, sourced from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.

Where does the data about PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES come from?

PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.

What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?

Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.

Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.