State influence profile · CT

Connecticut political money

43 federal politicians, $5.0M in PAC contributions received, and $99.9M in lobbying by in-state organizations, from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov filings through August 2026.

43
Politicians
$5.0M
Contributions
$99.9M
Lobbying
$35.0M
Contracts

The state picture

Connecticut ranks #37 of 56 tracked states and territories by combined federal money flow ($139.9M), with $5.0M in PAC receipts across 43 politicians.

#37
of 56 by combined flow
$5.0M
PAC contributions received
$99.9M
lobbying by in-state filers
$35.0M
federal contracts awarded

Federal money-flow plate

Sheet CT · Connecticut $139.9M

LOBBY-LED · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · SLIM-BENCH · BOOK-TRACE · STATE-DESK

  • LOBBY-LED 71% lobbying
  • MID-PACK #37/56
  • PHOTO-FINISH ±6.4% peer
  • SLIM-BENCH 43 politicians
  • BOOK-TRACE $139.9M book
  • STATE-DESK State filing desk

Nearest combined-flow peer: West Virginia ($-8,948,572.69)

Instrument codes from this state’s FEC PAC receipts, Senate LDA lobbying, and USAspending contracts, channel lead, peer rank, photo-finish gap, politician bench, book size, and filing desk, not a causal influence score.

Combined-flow neighbourhood around Connecticut

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest combined-flow peers among tracked states and territories, not a full-board reprint.

MP · lowest$3KKS · near$115.9MRI · near$119.3MMT · near$120.5MWV · near$131.0MCT · this state$139.9MVA · highest$96.0B

Source: FEC, U.S. Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov As of 2023–2024

Connecticut's three federal money flows

Campaign contributions received, lobbying spent by in-state organizations, and federal contracts awarded, side by side.

Contributions received$5.0MLobbying spent$99.9MContracts awarded$35.0M

Source: FEC, U.S. Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov As of 2023–2024

How Political Money Moves Through Connecticut

Connecticut (CT) shows $5.0M in PAC contributions across 43 tracked politicians, $99.9M in lobbying by in-state filers, and $35.0M in federal contracts - combined-flow rank #37 of 56. Top PAC recipient: John B Larson. Top filing-address organization: PITNEY BOWES INC.. Filing-address state is not corporate headquarters; combined activity is a discovery sum, not causation.

How to read channels, attribution, and sources

Contributions = FEC PAC receipts to candidates; lobbying = Senate LDA registrant spend; contracts = USAspending awards. Each channel is a separate official population.

Lobbying is attributed by registrant place of business; contracts by place of performance. See the methodology for attribution limits and source documents (FEC Form 3/3X/5, LD-2, FEDERALAWARDS).

Politicians from Connecticut

#PoliticianPartyTotal received
1John B LarsonHouseD$1.0M
2Jim HimesHouseD$1.0M
3Jahana HayesHouseD$945K
4Rosa L DelauroHouseD$861K
5Joseph CourtneyHouseD$628K
6George S LoganHouseR$438K
7Christopher S MurphySenateD$60K
8Mike FranceHouseR$10K
9Ahmad Aj DarwishHouseGRE$5K
10Michael GoldsteinHouseR$5K
11Michael GoldsteinHouseR$1K
12Rafael IrizarryHouseR$314
13Marcus FurzeHouseD$150

Top organizations in Connecticut

PITNEY BOWES INC.$38.6MCHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC.$28.8MBOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA COR…$9.7MTHE TRAVELERS COS., INC. AND…$5.2MHARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP (FK…$4.5MASML US, LLC$4.2MSYNCHRONY FINANCIAL$3.7MUBS AMERICAS INC.$2.9M
Top organizations by combined activity · Connecticut
#OrganizationCombined activity
1PITNEY BOWES INC.pac$38.6M
2CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC.pac$28.8M
3BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATIONpac$9.7M
4THE TRAVELERS COS., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESlobbying_client$5.2M
5HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP (FKA HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP)lobbying_client$4.5M
6ASML US, LLClobbying_client$4.2M
7SYNCHRONY FINANCIALlobbying_client$3.7M
8UBS AMERICAS INC.pac$2.9M
9W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATIONlobbying_client$2.2M
10FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING FOUNDATIONlobbying_client$1.9M
11SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INClobbying_client$1.4M
12YALE UNIVERSITYlobbying_client$1.3M
13UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUTlobbying_client$1.3M
14PURDUE PHARMA LPlobbying_client$1.2M
15SANDY HOOK PROMISE ACTION FUNDlobbying_client$990K
16LEGO SYSTEMS, INC.lobbying_client$970K
17ATHENE USAlobbying_client$960K
18EQUINOR WIND US LLClobbying_client$880K
19DIGITAL CURRENCY GROUPlobbying_client$820K
20VANTAGESCORE SOLUTIONS, LLClobbying_client$805K

Frequently Asked Questions

How much political money flows through Connecticut?

Connecticut politicians received $5.0M in PAC contributions during the 2024 election cycle, while organizations with a disclosed FEC/LDA filing address in the state spent $99.9M on federal lobbying and received $35.0M in federal contracts. Filing-address state is not corporate headquarters. Data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov.

How many politicians represent Connecticut at the federal level?

43 politicians from Connecticut are tracked in FEC filings for the 2024 cycle. This includes candidates for Senate and House seats. The top fundraiser is John B Larson. All data covers PAC and organizational contributions, not individual donations.

Which organizations show the most recorded federal activity in Connecticut?

PITNEY BOWES INC. is among the top organizations with a disclosed filing address in Connecticut by combined activity. Combined activity is a convenience sum of campaign contributions, lobbying expenditures, and federal contract awards (three separate populations), not causal political influence. See the organization rankings above.

What is the difference between contributions, lobbying, and contracts?

Campaign contributions are donations from PACs to political candidates (tracked by the FEC). Lobbying is spending disclosed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (Senate LDA filings). Federal contracts are government procurement awards to private companies (tracked by USAspending.gov). Combined activity adds those three separate populations for discovery only; it is not causation or a single strategy score.

Where does Connecticut political money data come from?

All data is sourced from official federal government databases: the Federal Election Commission (campaign contributions), the Senate Office of Public Records (lobbying disclosures), and USAspending.gov (federal contracts). PlainInfluence aggregates and presents this public data for transparency. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.

Context: Campaign Finance 101 · All states · Influence rankings

Data: FEC, Senate LDA, USAspending.gov. 2023-2024 data. Verify filings at fec.gov/data.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence.

Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. State-level totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.