State influence profile · OK
Oklahoma political money
56 federal politicians, $6.1M in PAC contributions received, and $48.1M in lobbying by in-state organizations, from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov filings through August 2026.
- 56
- Politicians
- $6.1M
- Contributions
- $48.1M
- Lobbying
- $173.9M
- Contracts
The state picture
Oklahoma ranks #31 of 56 tracked states and territories by combined federal money flow ($228.1M), with $6.1M in PAC receipts across 56 politicians.
- #31
- of 56 by combined flow
- $6.1M
- PAC contributions received
- $48.1M
- lobbying by in-state filers
- $173.9M
- federal contracts awarded
Federal money-flow plate
Sheet OK · Oklahoma $228.1M
CONTRACT-LED · MID-PACK · NEAR-PEER · FULL-BENCH · BOOK-TRACE · STATE-DESK
- CONTRACT-LED 76% contracts
- MID-PACK #31/56
- NEAR-PEER ±12% peer
- FULL-BENCH 56 politicians
- BOOK-TRACE $228.1M book
- STATE-DESK State filing desk
Nearest combined-flow peer: Indiana ($-28,245,875.02)
Instrument codes from this state’s FEC PAC receipts, Senate LDA lobbying, and USAspending contracts, channel lead, peer rank, photo-finish gap, politician bench, book size, and filing desk, not a causal influence score.
Combined-flow neighbourhood around Oklahoma
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest combined-flow peers among tracked states and territories, not a full-board reprint.
Oklahoma's three federal money flows
Campaign contributions received, lobbying spent by in-state organizations, and federal contracts awarded, side by side.
How Political Money Moves Through Oklahoma
Oklahoma (OK) shows $6.1M in PAC contributions across 56 tracked politicians, $48.1M in lobbying by in-state filers, and $173.9M in federal contracts - combined-flow rank #31 of 56. Top PAC recipient: Tom Cole. Top filing-address organization: CHICKASAW NATION. Filing-address state is not corporate headquarters; combined activity is a discovery sum, not causation.
How to read channels, attribution, and sources
Contributions = FEC PAC receipts to candidates; lobbying = Senate LDA registrant spend; contracts = USAspending awards. Each channel is a separate official population.
Lobbying is attributed by registrant place of business; contracts by place of performance. See the methodology for attribution limits and source documents (FEC Form 3/3X/5, LD-2, FEDERALAWARDS).
Politicians from Oklahoma
| # | Politician | Party | Total received |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tom ColeHouse | R | $2.5M |
| 2 | Kevin HernHouse | R | $1.4M |
| 3 | Frank D. LucasHouse | R | $1.1M |
| 4 | Stephanie BiceHouse | R | $886K |
| 5 | Josh BrecheenHouse | R | $104K |
| 6 | Markwayne Mr. MullinHouse | R | $61K |
| 7 | Madison HornHouse | D | $7K |
| 8 | Sarah Elizabeth GrayHouse | D | $4K |
| 9 | Brandon Keith WadeHouse | D | $1K |
| 10 | Kody Craig MacaulayHouse | D | $636 |
Top organizations in Oklahoma
| # | Organization | Combined activity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHICKASAW NATIONcorporation | $101.0M |
| 2 | AVIATION TRAINING CONSULTING, LLCcorporation | $74.2M |
| 3 | CONOCOPHILLIPSpac | $17.9M |
| 4 | THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.pac | $4.3M |
| 5 | NATIONAL RURAL WATER ASSOCIATIONlobbying_client | $2.8M |
| 6 | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED LENDERS INCpac | $2.0M |
| 7 | ONEOK INC.pac | $1.5M |
| 8 | AMERICAN FIDELITY CORPORATIONpac | $1.1M |
| 9 | WILLIAMS COMPANIESlobbying_client | $889K |
| 10 | MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES INClobbying_client | $880K |
| 11 | DEVON ENERGYlobbying_client | $800K |
| 12 | OGE ENERGY CORPpac | $791K |
| 13 | UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMAlobbying_client | $780K |
| 14 | THE CHEROKEE NATIONlobbying_client | $720K |
| 15 | MUSCOGEE CREEK NATIONlobbying_client | $640K |
| 16 | CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMAlobbying_client | $620K |
| 17 | GPA MIDSTREAM ASSOCIATIONpac | $421K |
| 18 | FRANCIS ENERGYlobbying_client | $414K |
| 19 | CALIBER FINANCIAL SERVICESlobbying_client | $400K |
| 20 | LUGERT-ALTUS IRRIGATION DISTRICTlobbying_client | $400K |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much political money flows through Oklahoma?
Oklahoma politicians received $6.1M in PAC contributions during the 2024 election cycle, while organizations with a disclosed FEC/LDA filing address in the state spent $48.1M on federal lobbying and received $173.9M in federal contracts. Filing-address state is not corporate headquarters. Data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov.
How many politicians represent Oklahoma at the federal level?
56 politicians from Oklahoma are tracked in FEC filings for the 2024 cycle. This includes candidates for Senate and House seats. The top fundraiser is Tom Cole. All data covers PAC and organizational contributions, not individual donations.
Which organizations show the most recorded federal activity in Oklahoma?
CHICKASAW NATION is among the top organizations with a disclosed filing address in Oklahoma by combined activity. Combined activity is a convenience sum of campaign contributions, lobbying expenditures, and federal contract awards (three separate populations), not causal political influence. See the organization rankings above.
What is the difference between contributions, lobbying, and contracts?
Campaign contributions are donations from PACs to political candidates (tracked by the FEC). Lobbying is spending disclosed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (Senate LDA filings). Federal contracts are government procurement awards to private companies (tracked by USAspending.gov). Combined activity adds those three separate populations for discovery only; it is not causation or a single strategy score.
Where does Oklahoma political money data come from?
All data is sourced from official federal government databases: the Federal Election Commission (campaign contributions), the Senate Office of Public Records (lobbying disclosures), and USAspending.gov (federal contracts). PlainInfluence aggregates and presents this public data for transparency. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
Context: Campaign Finance 101 · All states · Influence rankings
Data: FEC, Senate LDA, USAspending.gov. 2023-2024 data. Verify filings at fec.gov/data.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. State-level totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.