State influence profile · SC

South Carolina political money

71 federal politicians, $4.8M in PAC contributions received, and $35.6M in lobbying by in-state organizations, from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov filings through August 2026.

71
Politicians
$4.8M
Contributions
$35.6M
Lobbying
$299.3M
Contracts

The state picture

South Carolina ranks #28 of 56 tracked states and territories by combined federal money flow ($339.7M), with $4.8M in PAC receipts across 71 politicians.

#28
of 56 by combined flow
$4.8M
PAC contributions received
$35.6M
lobbying by in-state filers
$299.3M
federal contracts awarded

Federal money-flow plate

Sheet SC · South Carolina $339.7M

CONTRACT-LED · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FULL-BENCH · BOOK-TRACE · STATE-DESK

  • CONTRACT-LED 88% contracts
  • MID-PACK #28/56
  • PHOTO-FINISH ±0.9% peer
  • FULL-BENCH 71 politicians
  • BOOK-TRACE $339.7M book
  • STATE-DESK State filing desk

Nearest combined-flow peer: Utah ($-3,224,659.87)

Instrument codes from this state’s FEC PAC receipts, Senate LDA lobbying, and USAspending contracts, channel lead, peer rank, photo-finish gap, politician bench, book size, and filing desk, not a causal influence score.

Combined-flow neighbourhood around South Carolina

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest combined-flow peers among tracked states and territories, not a full-board reprint.

MP · lowest$3KNV · near$317.6MUT · near$336.5MSC · this state$339.7MLA · near$364.7MNC · near$376.2MVA · highest$96.0B

Source: FEC, U.S. Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov As of 2023–2024

South Carolina's three federal money flows

Campaign contributions received, lobbying spent by in-state organizations, and federal contracts awarded, side by side.

Contributions received$4.8MLobbying spent$35.6MContracts awarded$299.3M

Source: FEC, U.S. Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov As of 2023–2024

How Political Money Moves Through South Carolina

South Carolina (SC) shows $4.8M in PAC contributions across 71 tracked politicians, $35.6M in lobbying by in-state filers, and $299.3M in federal contracts - combined-flow rank #28 of 56. Top PAC recipient: James E. Clyburn. Top filing-address organization: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL. Filing-address state is not corporate headquarters; combined activity is a discovery sum, not causation.

How to read channels, attribution, and sources

Contributions = FEC PAC receipts to candidates; lobbying = Senate LDA registrant spend; contracts = USAspending awards. Each channel is a separate official population.

Lobbying is attributed by registrant place of business; contracts by place of performance. See the methodology for attribution limits and source documents (FEC Form 3/3X/5, LD-2, FEDERALAWARDS).

Politicians from South Carolina

#PoliticianPartyTotal received
1James E. ClyburnHouseD$1.4M
2William R Iv TimmonsHouseR$1.0M
3Nancy MaceHouseR$574K
4Russell FryHouseR$478K
5Joe The Hon. WilsonHouseR$399K
6Jeffrey D Mr. DuncanHouseR$385K
7Sheri BiggsHouseR$273K
8Ralph W. Jr. NormanHouseR$189K
9Adam MorganHouseR$13K
10Duke BucknerHouseR$11K
11Catherine TempletonHouseR$10K
12Kevin BishopHouseR$10K
13Michael B MooreHouseD$7K
14Stewart JonesHouseR$7K
15Kathryn HarveyHouseD$5K
16William Mcadoo Mac DefordHouseD$1K
17Mark BurnsHouseR$500
18Gregg DixonHouseOTH$406

Top organizations in South Carolina

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNAT…$300.2MRENEWABLE ENERGY AGGREGATORS…$1.4MMILLIKEN & COMPANY$1.4MCLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1.4MBELL LEGAL GROUP$1.4MCONNECTED COMMERCE COUNCIL$1.4MNEW INDY CATAWBA LLC$1.4MMICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC$1.3M
Top organizations by combined activity · South Carolina
#OrganizationCombined activity
1ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONALcorporation$300.2M
2RENEWABLE ENERGY AGGREGATORS, INC.lobbying_client$1.4M
3MILLIKEN & COMPANYpac$1.4M
4CLEMSON UNIVERSITYlobbying_client$1.4M
5BELL LEGAL GROUPlobbying_client$1.4M
6CONNECTED COMMERCE COUNCILlobbying_client$1.4M
7NEW INDY CATAWBA LLClobbying_client$1.4M
8MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INClobbying_client$1.3M
9INGEVITY CORPORATIONlobbying_client$880K
10ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL (ON BEHALF OF NATIONAL ARMAMENTS CONSORTIUM)lobbying_client$830K
11GORDIAN GROUPlobbying_client$740K
12MANAGEYOURIDlobbying_client$670K
13ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.lobbying_client$650K
14ROPER ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARElobbying_client$600K
15STURGEON INDUSTRY ALLIANCE OF AMERICAlobbying_client$560K
16SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA INC.lobbying_client$540K
17ANMED HEALTH SYSTEMlobbying_client$510K
18SPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEMlobbying_client$480K
19COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYlobbying_client$480K
20NATIONAL INSTALLMENT LENDERS ASSOCIATIONlobbying_client$460K

Frequently Asked Questions

How much political money flows through South Carolina?

South Carolina politicians received $4.8M in PAC contributions during the 2024 election cycle, while organizations with a disclosed FEC/LDA filing address in the state spent $35.6M on federal lobbying and received $299.3M in federal contracts. Filing-address state is not corporate headquarters. Data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov.

How many politicians represent South Carolina at the federal level?

71 politicians from South Carolina are tracked in FEC filings for the 2024 cycle. This includes candidates for Senate and House seats. The top fundraiser is James E. Clyburn. All data covers PAC and organizational contributions, not individual donations.

Which organizations show the most recorded federal activity in South Carolina?

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is among the top organizations with a disclosed filing address in South Carolina by combined activity. Combined activity is a convenience sum of campaign contributions, lobbying expenditures, and federal contract awards (three separate populations), not causal political influence. See the organization rankings above.

What is the difference between contributions, lobbying, and contracts?

Campaign contributions are donations from PACs to political candidates (tracked by the FEC). Lobbying is spending disclosed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (Senate LDA filings). Federal contracts are government procurement awards to private companies (tracked by USAspending.gov). Combined activity adds those three separate populations for discovery only; it is not causation or a single strategy score.

Where does South Carolina political money data come from?

All data is sourced from official federal government databases: the Federal Election Commission (campaign contributions), the Senate Office of Public Records (lobbying disclosures), and USAspending.gov (federal contracts). PlainInfluence aggregates and presents this public data for transparency. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.

Context: Campaign Finance 101 · All states · Influence rankings

Data: FEC, Senate LDA, USAspending.gov. 2023-2024 data. Verify filings at fec.gov/data.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence.

Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. State-level totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.