Politicians supported
5
distinct FEC recipients
pac · DC
INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES
Active on two fronts: $12K in campaign contributions and $120K in lobbying, no federal contracts on record.
- $132K
- Total influence
- $12K
- Contributions
- $120K
- Lobbying
The verdict
INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES ranks in the top 55% of 21,545 organizations with tracked federal activity, split between campaign contributions and lobbying, with no federal contracts on record.
- Top 55%
- of 21,545 tracked organizations
- $12K
- campaign contributions
- $120K
- lobbying expenditures
Lobbying years filed
2
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
3
distinct policy categories
How INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES's federal influence breaks down
The three tracked channels for INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES, side by side. Its largest channel is lobbying expenditures at $120K.
Lobbying share of total influence 91.3%
Higher share = lobbying-heavy strategy vs. contributions or contracts
What INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES's influence footprint shows
INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES, headquartered in DC, pairs campaign giving with lobbying but holds no federal contracts: $12K in PAC contributions alongside $120K in disclosed lobbying expenditures.
On the campaign side, INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES's PAC contributions reached 5 federal politicians, led by James French Hill at $6K. Its lobbying profile spans 2 reporting years across 3 distinct LDA issue areas, with emphasis on Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Retirement, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.
Politicians supported
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| James French Hill | R | $6K |
| G. William (bill) Foster | D | $3K |
| Pete Aguilar | D | $1K |
| Bradley S. Schneider | D | $1K |
| Jim Himes | D | $1K |
Lobbying by year
| Year | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $0 |
| 2023 | $120K |
Lobbying issues
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES have?
INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES has a combined political influence footprint of $132K, made up of $12K in campaign contributions and $120K in lobbying expenditures. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES support?
INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES contributed $12K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES supported 5 politicians, with the largest contribution going to James French Hill ($6K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
What issues does INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES lobby on?
INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES spent $120K on federal lobbying. Key issue areas include Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Retirement, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code. Lobbying disclosures are filed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) and are public record.
Where does the data about INSTITUTE FOR PORTFOLIO ALTERNATIVES come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.
Related guides
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.