Politicians supported
7
distinct FEC recipients
pac · CA
Active on two fronts: $27K in campaign contributions and $120K in lobbying, no federal contracts on record. Data through August 2026.
The verdict
California Fresh Fruit Association ranks in the top 55% of 21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity, split between campaign contributions and lobbying, with no federal contracts on record.
Where California Fresh Fruit Association's total federal influence footprint sits
21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity
$146,500 11943rd of 21666 higher than 9,723 of 21,666 organizations
the full population, bucketed by value
Each bar is a $50K-wide band; taller bars hold more organizations. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source FEC contributions, LDA lobbying disclosures, and USASpending federal contracts · August 2026
Politicians supported
7
distinct FEC recipients
Lobbying years filed
2
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
1
distinct policy categories
The three tracked channels for California Fresh Fruit Association, side by side. Its largest channel is lobbying expenditures at $120K.
Each tracked channel is percentile-scored against its own national benchmark, then averaged across only the channels that apply to a pac -- not one dollar sum where contract size can drown out everything else.
Overall activity score
F
12/100
Campaign contributions
F
17/100 · $27K
Lobbying expenditures
F
18/100 · $120K
Federal contracts
F
2/100 · $0
Independent expenditures
F
10/100 · $0
California Fresh Fruit Association, with a disclosed filing address in CA, pairs campaign giving with lobbying but holds no federal contracts: $27K in PAC contributions alongside $120K in disclosed lobbying expenditures.
On the campaign side, California Fresh Fruit Association's PAC contributions reached 7 federal politicians, led by David Valadao at $7K. Its lobbying profile spans 2 reporting years across 1 distinct LDA issue area, with emphasis on Agriculture.
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| David Valadao | R | $7K |
| Jim Costa | D | $7K |
| Vince Fong | R | $5K |
| Adam Schiff | D | $4K |
| Kevin Mccarthy | R | $3K |
| James Austin Scott | R | $2K |
| Jimmy Panetta | D | $500 |
| Year | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $60K |
| 2023 | $60K |
Cross-state nearest neighbors on two independent axes, combined tracked activity and Senate LDA lobbying spend, so the lattice is not filing-state containment.
Other organizations with nearest total contributions + lobbying + contracts ($147K here), outside CA filing-state peers.
Nearest LDA lobbying totals ($120K here) on a separate axis from combined activity.
California Fresh Fruit Association has a combined recorded federal activity total of $147K, made up of $27K in campaign contributions and $120K in lobbying expenditures. This is a convenience sum across three separate official populations, not a measure of causal political influence. Data from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov for 2023-2024.
California Fresh Fruit Association contributed $27K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. California Fresh Fruit Association supported 7 politicians, with the largest contribution going to David Valadao ($7K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
California Fresh Fruit Association spent $120K on federal lobbying. Key issue areas include Agriculture. Lobbying disclosures are filed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) and are public record.
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
Combined activity (internally total_influence) is a convenience sum of three different official populations: FEC campaign contributions (2024 election cycle), Senate LDA lobbying expenditures (2023 and 2024 filing years, summed), and USAspending federal contract obligations (fiscal year 2024). It is a cross-dataset discovery index only, not causation, effectiveness, or political influence. Channel dollars are shown side by side; see /methodology#cross-stage-populations.
What to do with this organization
Every figure traces to a real FEC, LDA, or USASpending filing; contribution and lobbying totals are not the same as spending on any specific outcome.
According to the Federal Election Commission and the Senate Office of Public Records, more than 14,000 political action committees and over 12,500 lobbying registrants filed disclosure reports covering the 2024 election cycle and calendar-year 2024 lobbying period respectively. Every figure on this page comes from official FEC, Senate LDA, or USAspending.gov filings, described on our methodology page. Data was last updated in August 2026.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.