Politicians supported
16
distinct FEC recipients
pac · DC
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
A measured campaign-giving-only footprint: $25K in PAC contributions, no lobbying or contract activity on record.
- $25K
- Total influence
- $25K
- Contributions
The verdict
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY ranks in the top 86% of 21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity, driven entirely by a measured PAC contribution history, topped by giving to Roger Sen. Wicker.
- Top 86%
- of 21,666 tracked organizations
- $25K
- campaign contributions
Lobbying years filed
0
LDA disclosure years
LDA issue areas
0
distinct policy categories
What AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY's influence footprint shows
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, headquartered in DC, shows no lobbying or contract activity in this dataset -- the entire tracked footprint is campaign giving: $25K in PAC contributions reported to the FEC, led by giving to Roger Sen. Wicker.
On the campaign side, AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY's PAC contributions reached 16 federal politicians, led by Roger Sen. Wicker at $4K.
Politicians supported
| Politician | Party | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Roger Sen. Wicker | R | $4K |
| Matthew A. Cartwright | D | $4K |
| Brad Sherman | D | $2K |
| Harold Dallas Rogers | R | $2K |
| Walter Michael Ezell | R | $2K |
| Scott Peters | D | $2K |
| Gerald Edward Connolly | D | $1K |
| Julia Brownley | D | $1K |
| Robert J. Mr. Wittman | R | $1K |
| Brian Mast | R | $1K |
| Donald W Norcross | D | $1K |
| Marcy Hon. M.c. Kaptur | D | $1K |
| Rick Larsen | D | $1K |
| Suzan K Delbene | D | $1K |
| Frank D. Lucas | R | $1K |
| Michael Garcia | R | $1K |
Frequently asked questions
How much political influence does AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY have?
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY has a combined political influence footprint of $25K, made up of $25K in campaign contributions. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.
Which politicians does AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY support?
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY contributed $25K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY supported 16 politicians, with the largest contribution going to Roger Sen. Wicker ($4K). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.
Where does the data about AEROJET ROCKETDYNE AN L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY come from?
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?
Total influence is a convenience sum of three different official populations: FEC campaign contributions (2024 election cycle), Senate LDA lobbying expenditures (2023 and 2024 filing years, summed), and USAspending federal contract obligations (fiscal year 2024). It is not a single-population metric and must not be read as a rate or strategy share. Channel dollars are shown side by side; see /methodology#cross-stage-populations.
Related guides
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Verify the underlying filings at fec.gov/data.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.