pac · DC

MONUMENT STRATEGIES

Combined federal influence footprint of $83K, led by lobbying expenditures ($80K) — sourced from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov filings for 2023–2024.

$83K
Total influence
$3K
Contributions
$80K
Lobbying

Politicians supported

6

distinct FEC recipients

Lobbying years filed

2

LDA disclosure years

LDA issue areas

2

distinct policy categories

How MONUMENT STRATEGIES's federal influence breaks down

The three tracked channels for MONUMENT STRATEGIES, side by side. Its largest channel is lobbying expenditures at $80K.

Campaign contributions$3KLobbying expenditures$80K

Source: FEC, U.S. Senate LDA, and USAspending.gov As of 2023–2024

Lobbying share of total influence 96.4%

Higher share = lobbying-heavy strategy vs. contributions or contracts

What MONUMENT STRATEGIES's influence footprint shows

MONUMENT STRATEGIES, headquartered in DC, registers a combined federal influence footprint of $83K across the three primary channels tracked in public filings: $3K in PAC campaign contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission, $80K in lobbying expenditures disclosed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act, and $0 in federal contract awards recorded on USAspending.gov. Together these figures reflect both how the organization seeks to influence policy and how federal dollars flow back to it.

On the campaign side, MONUMENT STRATEGIES's PAC contributions reached 6 federal politicians, led by David Rouzer at $750. Its lobbying profile spans 2 reporting years across 2 distinct LDA issue areas, with emphasis on Trade (domestic/foreign), Tobacco.

Viewing contributions, lobbying, and contracts side-by-side is the key to reading this organization's relationship with the federal government: campaign giving signals which lawmakers are prioritized, lobbying expenditures signal which policy outcomes are being pursued, and contract awards signal where procurement decisions have already landed. Each component is independently sourced from official government disclosures covering the 2023-2024 period.

Politicians supported

Top recipients of MONUMENT STRATEGIES PAC contributions · FEC (2024 cycle)

David Rouzer$750Kevin Mr. Cramer$500Richard L. Jr. Hudson$500Kristen Mcdonald rivet$500Brad Knott$500Gregory Francis Dr. Murphy$250
Top recipients of MONUMENT STRATEGIES PAC contributions · FEC (2024 cycle)
Politician Party Amount
David Rouzer R $750
Kevin Mr. Cramer R $500
Richard L. Jr. Hudson R $500
Kristen Mcdonald rivet D $500
Brad Knott R $500
Gregory Francis Dr. Murphy R $250

Lobbying by year

Year Amount
2024 $40K
2023 $40K

Frequently asked questions

How much political influence does MONUMENT STRATEGIES have?

MONUMENT STRATEGIES has a combined political influence footprint of $83K, which includes $3K in campaign contributions, $80K in lobbying expenditures, and $0 in federal contracts. This data comes from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov records for 2023-2024.

Which politicians does MONUMENT STRATEGIES support?

MONUMENT STRATEGIES contributed $3K to political campaigns during the 2024 election cycle through its PAC. MONUMENT STRATEGIES supported 6 politicians, with the largest contribution going to David Rouzer ($750). All contribution data is sourced from Federal Election Commission filings.

What issues does MONUMENT STRATEGIES lobby on?

MONUMENT STRATEGIES spent $80K on federal lobbying. Key issue areas include Trade (domestic/foreign), Tobacco. Lobbying disclosures are filed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) and are public record.

Where does the data about MONUMENT STRATEGIES come from?

PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.

What is "total influence" and how is it calculated?

Total influence is the sum of an organization's campaign contributions, lobbying spending, and federal contract values. It provides a single metric for comparing the overall political and economic footprint of organizations in the federal arena. Each component is independently sourced from official government filings.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainInfluence Editorial.