Candidates targeted
2
races with outside spending
pac · CA
An outside-spending committee: $187K in independent expenditures ($187K supporting, $0 opposing candidates) - reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign. Data through August 2026.
The verdict
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians is an outside-spending committee: it made $187K in independent expenditures across 2 candidates, mostly supporting ($187K).
Where Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians's total federal influence footprint sits
21,666 organizations with tracked federal activity
$170,000 10416th of 21666 higher than 11,250 of 21,666 organizations
the full population, bucketed by value
Each bar is a $50K-wide band; taller bars hold more organizations. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source FEC contributions, LDA lobbying disclosures, and USASpending federal contracts · August 2026
Candidates targeted
2
races with outside spending
Supporting
$187K
independent expenditures for
Opposing
$0
independent expenditures against
Money this committee spent independently to support or oppose candidates, reported to the FEC, and by law not contributions to any campaign and not coordinated with it.
| Candidate | Supporting | Opposing |
|---|---|---|
| Evan Low | $111K | - |
| Vince Fong | $76K | - |
Each tracked channel is percentile-scored against its own national benchmark, then averaged across only the channels that apply to a pac -- not one dollar sum where contract size can drown out everything else.
Overall activity score
F
12/100
Campaign contributions
F
9/100 · $0
Lobbying expenditures
F
22/100 · $170K
Federal contracts
F
2/100 · $0
Independent expenditures
F
14/100 · $187K
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians is an outside-spending committee: rather than contributing to candidates' committees, it reported $187K in independent expenditures to the Federal Election Commission - $187K advocating for candidates and $0 opposing them, across 2 races. By law these expenditures are made independently of, and uncoordinated with, any campaign, and they are not subject to contribution limits, which is how a single committee can deploy this scale of money. They are reported here separately from contributions because they are a fundamentally different mechanism of political influence.
Its lobbying profile spans 2 reporting years across 1 distinct LDA issue area, with emphasis on Indian/Native American Affairs.
| Year | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $90K |
| 2023 | $80K |
Cross-state nearest neighbors on two independent axes, combined tracked activity and Senate LDA lobbying spend, so the lattice is not filing-state containment.
Other organizations with nearest total contributions + lobbying + contracts ($170K here), outside CA filing-state peers.
Nearest LDA lobbying totals ($170K here) on a separate axis from combined activity.
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians has a combined recorded federal activity total of $170K, made up of $170K in lobbying expenditures. This is a convenience sum across three separate official populations, not a measure of causal political influence. Data from FEC filings, Senate LDA disclosures, and USAspending.gov for 2023-2024.
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians spent $170K on federal lobbying. Key issue areas include Indian/Native American Affairs. Lobbying disclosures are filed under the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) and are public record.
PlainInfluence aggregates data from three federal sources: the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for campaign contributions, the Senate Office of Public Records for lobbying disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and USAspending.gov for federal contract awards. Data covers the 2023-2024 reporting period.
Combined activity (internally total_influence) is a convenience sum of three different official populations: FEC campaign contributions (2024 election cycle), Senate LDA lobbying expenditures (2023 and 2024 filing years, summed), and USAspending federal contract obligations (fiscal year 2024). It is a cross-dataset discovery index only, not causation, effectiveness, or political influence. Channel dollars are shown side by side; see /methodology#cross-stage-populations.
What to do with this organization
Every figure traces to a real FEC, LDA, or USASpending filing; contribution and lobbying totals are not the same as spending on any specific outcome.
According to the Federal Election Commission and the Senate Office of Public Records, more than 14,000 political action committees and over 12,500 lobbying registrants filed disclosure reports covering the 2024 election cycle and calendar-year 2024 lobbying period respectively. Every figure on this page comes from official FEC, Senate LDA, or USAspending.gov filings, described on our methodology page. Data was last updated in August 2026.
Every figure on PlainInfluence is rendered directly from official FEC, Senate LDA and USAspending records, no number is typed in by an editor. Contribution, lobbying, and contract totals are aggregated directly from FEC, Senate LDA, and USAspending bulk data, no figure is hand-entered. Disclosed contributions, lobbying, and contracts are lawful, regulated activities, appearing on this page is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our disclaimer, or report a data error. Data current as of 2023-2024.